Kerry Howard Mwesigwa.
While launching the report for the second quarter of 2023, the Uganda Law Society (ULS) addressed the pressing issue of misconduct within the legal profession. Bernard Oundo, the President of ULS, expressed deep concern over the rise of fraudulent behavior among lawyers in the country. Cases involving fraud, misrepresentation, and non-appearance in court have escalated, prompting a call for stricter regulation and disciplinary measures.
Oundo emphasized the pivotal role of the Uganda Law Council in dealing with complaints and ensuring accountability within the legal fraternity. He noted that month after month, the council has been inundated with an increasing number of misconduct cases, primarily involving male advocates. Such allegations undermine public trust in the legal system and present significant challenges to the integrity of the legal profession.
In the report, the ULS acknowledged commendable efforts in the fight against corruption and the upholding of human rights in Uganda. Special recognition was given to the State House Anti-Corruption Unit for their work, with a plea to prioritize high-profile cases to send a strong message against corruption. The establishment of the Uganda Human Rights Commission Tribunal was lauded as well, as it provides a crucial platform for addressing human rights violations.
However, concerns were raised regarding the curtailment of freedom of expression and assembly by security agencies. The ULS advocated for greater protection of these fundamental rights and strongly condemned acts of violence, emphasizing the value of safeguarding the right to life.
The issue of prison congestion emerged as another pressing matter addressed by the ULS. With prisons consistently exceeding their approved capacity and becoming overcrowded. The society urged the government to develop a comprehensive strategy that explores alternative approaches to crime and reduce reliance on imprisonment as the primary solution.
Discussions also shed light on the internal mechanisms for disciplining errant police officers. The need for adequate staffing and resources within the Judiciary, Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions, and Police investigations department was stressed to ensure the effective handling of cases.
